
The Neighbourhood Plan Public Exhibition was held on Friday 29th, Saturday 30th and Sunday 31st March. 107 people attended over the three days.
Clarifications from the Village Exhibition
There was a lively discussion at the Exhibition and a number of issues were raised by villagers. The following is a summary of the main issues not fully covered in the consultation document:
1. When will the Historic Review that is referenced under the Environmental Assessment be taking place?
Probably in May 2019 before we finalise the draft NP
2. What are the timescales and key milestones after the 10th April?
A preliminary report on the second survey and exhibition will be published with recommendations to the Parish Council by Tuesday 23rd April (next PC meeting). There will be a progress report to the Annual Village Meeting on Tuesday 30th April at 7.30pm in the Village Hall
3. Who are the promoters / agents for each site?
Site 1: Hockaday Paddock - Rectory Homes
Site 2: Holymans Farm - Savills (Agents)
Site 3: Palm Piece - Rectory Homes
Site 4: Allotments - Rectory Homes
Site 5: Dadbrook Farm - Brown and Company (Agents)
Site 6: Healey Garden - Mr Healey (owner)
4. What are the housing requirements?
We need a minimum of 12 new homes to be consistent with the Vale of Aylesbury Local Plan (VALP)
VALP Table 2 shows 25 houses allocated in Cuddington
4 completions/commitments, 21 allocated
The 21 allocated were 6 for Aylesbury Road and 15 for Dadbrook
Aylesbury Road planning application (approved) was for 8 houses and one new house is being built at Dadbrook.
So the current figures are :-
13 completions/commitments, (min) 12 (to be) allocated
5. Can we control development within the plan period?
The current planning context is provided by the Aylesbury Vale Local Plan. This will be replaced later in the year when VALP is adopted.
It is hoped that the Cuddington NP will be adopted by summer 2019. It will then hold until 2033 but is subject to review every 5 years, i.e. in 2024 and 2029.
Once the NP is adopted only those sites that have been allocated in the NP can be built and developers will need to submit detailed proposals and a planning application for approval by AVDC in the usual way.
Planning applications for sites NOT allocated in the NP will not normally be granted unless the developer can demonstrate that there is a significant shortage of housing within the district as a whole.
(The planning position for infill sites is described in Question 6 below).
The new Buckinghamshire unitary authority will replace AVDC as the planning authority in 2020 and will probably complete a new planning policy to replace VALP before we need to review the Cuddington NP in 2024. The new planning strategy may look for villages like Cuddington to take more houses however this seems unlikely in that:-
a) Housing requirements seem to be going down
b) We will have a recently adopted NP that includes housing allocations
c) Most of the housing growth will be in the north of the area and linked to the expressway
6. How are infill sites treated in planning terms?
Until VALP is adopted later in the year the planning policies in the Aylesbury Vale District Local Plan (AVDLP) apply.
The advice from AVDC planning is “that AVDLP is the adopted plan with full weight and for a development of 4 homes if it came in now it is that which we would (use to) determine the planning application. If the application comes in in October, say, then we might be using the VALP by then, but it only replaces AVDLP on adoption. VALP will have some weight, but limited, in the meantime”.
AVDLP includes planning policies for small infill sites in villages but, once adopted, VALP will protect medium sized villages such as Cuddington from infill except in exceptional circumstances. This means that there is a ’window’ between now and the end of the year when infill applications could be considered by AVDC.
7. Who chooses the sites to be allocated?
The NP Steering Group will review the findings of the village surveys (1st and 2nd) alongside the environmental report prepared by ONeill Homer. They will make a recommendation to the Parish Council who will decide which site(s) to include in the DRAFT NP.
The DRAFT NP will then be subject to further consultation and amendment before it is submitted for independent planning review and a Referendum.
8. How will a housing site be selected?
A proposed housing allocation will be selected for consideration by the Parish Council based on:-
1. Community preferences
2. Environmental effects
3. Contribution to potential community benefits
4. Contribution towards the NP Vison and Objectives eg low cost housing and access
9. What are the details of the proposed Palm Piece parking area?
If the site is allocated, the details, including the size and location of the parking area, would be settled later, when a planning application is made. The intention is that vehicle access would be from the proposed highway access on to Bridgeway and not from the existing concrete path. There would be pedestrian access between the parking area and the Upper Green via the existing concrete path.
The parking area would be available for all users and is likely to be an informal gravel surface.
For the school, the parking area would potentially give access to the back of the school field via a secure gate for teachers only. For safety reasons, parents would be able use the parking area but would still need to drop off and pick up their children from the front of the school as they do now.
10. If Palm Piece or Hockaday Paddock sites were selected would extending the 30mph limits be mandatory and would they definitely happen?
Any proposed changes to speed limits as a result of new development along Aylesbury Road or Bridgeway would need to be approved by the highway authority (Bucks CC) after consultation with the police as enforcing authority.
Following the traffic survey and feasibility study last year the Parish Council are working with Bucks highways to understand the options available and the likely costs.
11. Why is Dadbrook back on the list of possible sites?
The history of the Dadbrook proposals are as follows:-
15 homes were allocated at Dadbrook Farm in the draft VALP by AVDC
The owner wanted more homes on the site to help pay for the necessary relocation of farm activities elsewhere on his landholdings.
The 15 homes are proposed to come out of VALP as they are ‘undeliverable’ ie the landowner won’t release the land for only 15 homes*.
The landowner is now promoting the removal of some farm buildings and the development of 31 new homes through the NP
*The current planning position is set out in AVDCs Examination document ED178 :-
Question I24.1
The Council agreed to revisit the question of deliverability of site CDN003 without a larger allocation conducive to the landowner’s desire to underwrite the relocation of farm buildings.
AVDC Response
AVDC contacted the site promoter Brown & Co of Banbury on 30 July 2018 to ascertain the intentions for the site and find out if the site were allocated for 15 homes as per the VALP allocation boundary, whether they would develop the site and if so when might a planning application come in.
The Council received a response from Brown & Co of Banbury on 14 August 2018 which is the letter below. The letter confirms the promoter is not interesting in progressing a development of the size and site boundary shown in the VALP Submission. If the site were allocated there would be no prospect of the site as described in site allocation proposal DCDN003 coming forward as a planning application.
Therefore the Council has now found that the site allocation proposal D-CDN003 is undeliverable under the terms the definition of a ‘deliverable site’ as set out in footnote 11 (paragraph 47) of the NPPF (2012). AVDC’s response to the Inspector’s Question I24.1 is as the site promoter does not support this amount of development and is seeking a larger development on a larger site than what is shown in the VALP, we will be suggesting the site CDN003 shown in the Submitted VALP is deleted through a modification. We intend to show this as a Proposed Modification.
The site promoter can respond to the Modifications consultation if they wish to reassess their position and also has the neighbourhood plan route available. The Council understands the site promoter has been engaging with the parish council regarding promoting a site for the neighbourhood plan which is at an early stage of preparation.